Evaluation of error types and quality on panoramic radiography

Ceren Aktuna Belgin(1), Gözde Serindere(2)
(1) Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Hatay, Turkey.,
(2) Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Hatay, Turkey.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of panoramic radiographic errors and to evaluate the correlation between age and panoramic radiographic error types.


Methodology: A total of 500 panoramic radiographs (259 male, 241 female) which have been taken for various reasons were randomly selected from the archive of our dentomaxillofacial radiology department.  Patients were divided into six age groups and by sex. The assessed errors included the tongue not in contact with palate, slumped position, patients not biting on bite block, patient movement, the chin tipped high, the chin tipped low, the patient positioned forward, the patient positioned backward, patient’ head turned to one side, foreign bodies in the image, exposure errors, positioning error of the lips and missing image. Each radiograph was quality rated as excellent, diagnostically acceptable or unacceptable.


Results: One or more errors were detected in 317 (63.4%) of the 500 panoramic radiographs, while no error was found in 183 (%36.6). It was observed that the most common error type was the slumped position (13.2%). Quality of the panoramic radiographs was evaluated according to the criteria, only 15% images were classified as “excellent”, 48.2% was as “inadequate for diagnosis” and 36.8% was as “adequate for diagnosis”. It was recorded that “slumped position” and “patient movement” errors were statistically significant in >56 years (p <0.05).


Conclusion: Patients can be protected from unnecessary radiation reception by investigating the causes of panoramic radiographic errors and training of technicians in this direction.


 


How to cite this article: Aktuna Belgin C, Serindere G. Evaluation of error types and quality on panoramic radiography. Int Dent Res 2019;9(3):99-104.


 


Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

Authors

Ceren Aktuna Belgin
dtcaktuna@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Gözde Serindere
Aktuna Belgin, C., & Serindere, G. (2019). Evaluation of error types and quality on panoramic radiography. International Dental Research, 9(3), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2019.vol9.no3.2

Article Details

How to Cite

Aktuna Belgin, C., & Serindere, G. (2019). Evaluation of error types and quality on panoramic radiography. International Dental Research, 9(3), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2019.vol9.no3.2
Smart Citations via scite_

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

The effect of ionizing radiation from dental radiographic devices on dental pulp stem cells

Onur Evren Kahraman, Tahir Karaman, Tuba Talo Yıldırım, Ebru Önalan, Serkan Dündar, Ahmet Tektemur
Abstract View : 95
Download :49

Evaluation of interobserver agreement of common errors and quality in panoramic radi-ographs

Evaluation of common errors in panoramic radiographs

Dilek Çoban, Yasin Yasa, Furkan Ozbey, Tunahan Tuna, Busra Nur Gokkurt, Zerrin Unal Erzurumlu,...
Abstract View : 0