Original Article
Comparative evaluation of the dimensional compatibility of ISO #30/.06 gutta-percha cones from four different manufacturers using an endodontic gauge
View article page
Kumru ŞazORCID, Hülya Nur NalbantORCID, Celalettin TopbaşORCID
Cite
Şaz K, Nalbant HN, Topbaş C. Comparative evaluation of the dimensional compatibility of ISO #30/.06 gutta-percha cones from four different manufacturers using an endodontic gauge. Int Dent Res. 2026;16(S1):e260664. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.664
- eISSN
- 2146-1767
- Submitted
- 5 June 2026
- Revised
- 30 June 2026
- Accepted
- 8 July 2026
- Published
- 11 July 2026
- Pages
- e260664
Abstract
Aim: Gutta-percha is the most commonly used biocompatible obturation material in endodontics for the three-dimensional and hermetic sealing of the root canal system. However, despite the dimensions defined in the ISO 6877 standard, dimensional discrepancies between gutta-percha cones and endodontic files have been reported. The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the dimensional variability of ISO #30/.06 gutta-percha cones from four different manufacturers using an endodontic gauge.
Methodology: A total of 240 ISO #30/.06 gutta-percha cones (n = 60 per brand) from four manufacturers (ProTaper Ultimate, MetaBiomed, Diadent, and EndoArt) were evaluated. Cone diameters were measured at the D0, D5, D10, and D15 levels using a Woodpecker R1 Plus endodontic gauge. Based on the ISO 6877 nominal dimensions, measurements were categorized as undersized, within the nominal range, or oversized. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05).
Results: Dimensional discrepancies from the nominal ISO values were observed across all measurement levels, with statistically significant differences among the brands (p < 0.05). ProTaper Ultimate and MetaBiomed showed the highest compatibility with nominal dimensions, whereas EndoArt exhibited a consistently high proportion of undersized cones (57.1–67.2%) across all regions. Diadent showed a notably high proportion of oversized cones at the D15 level (66.7%). Effect sizes for between-brand comparisons were large at every level (Cramer's V = 0.386–0.503).
Conclusion: ISO #30/.06 gutta-percha cones from different manufacturers did not show complete dimensional compatibility. These discrepancies may adversely affect apical adaptation, particularly in single-cone obturation techniques, potentially reducing clinical success. The use of an endodontic gauge provides a practical means of objectively verifying cone–canal adaptation in clinical practice, helping to prevent microleakage and obturation errors.
Keywords
License
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by International Dental Research.