The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis

Ömür Dereci(1), Görkem Tekin(2), Yasin Çağlar Koşar(3)
(1) Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Eskişehir, Turkey, Türkiye
(2) Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Eskişehir, Turkey, Türkiye
(3) Private Practice, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Eskişehir, Turkey, Türkiye

Abstract

Aim:  The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% hyaluronic acid (HA), and 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) gel in reducing pain and improving clinical signs and symptoms of alveolar osteitis.


Methodology: The clinical data of patients treated for alveolar osteitis between 01/01/2015 and 01/01/2019 were retrieved for this study. All patients were initially treated by curettage and physiological saline irrigation. Patients were then divided into 4 groups. Group 1 was considered the control group; no other biomaterials were administered after curettage and physiological saline irrigation. All other groups were administered an additional treatment in the socket after curettage and physiological saline irrigation (Group 1 – Alveogyl; Group 2 - 0.8% HA; Group 3 - 0.2% CHX). Patents were evaluated before surgery as well as days 3 and 7 after surgery. The postoperative evaluations included: Visual analog scale(VAS) pain scores, the presence of clinical signs and symptoms of exposed alveolar bone, disorganized blood clot, inflammation around the socket, and bad odor and taste.


Results: Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in all control evaluations (p>0.05). There was significantly reduced inflammation around the extraction socket on postoperative day 7 in the CHX group compared to that in the control group (p<0.05). No other significant changes in clinical signs and symptoms were observed among groups.


Conclusion: There was no significant difference between curettage with physiological saline irrigation alone and the addition of Alveogyl, 0.8% HA, or 0.2% CHX in the reduction of pain in alveolar osteitis. Nonetheless, CHX may reduce inflammation around the extraction sockets.


 


How to cite this article: Dereci Ö, Görkem T, Koşar YÇ. The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. Int Dent Res 2021;11(1):6-11.


https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no1.2


 


Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

Authors

Ömür Dereci
Görkem Tekin
dt.gorkemtekin@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Yasin Çağlar Koşar
Dereci, Ömür, Tekin, G., & Koşar, Y. Çağlar. (2021). The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. International Dental Research, 11(1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no1.2

Article Details

How to Cite

Dereci, Ömür, Tekin, G., & Koşar, Y. Çağlar. (2021). The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. International Dental Research, 11(1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no1.2
Smart Citations via scite_

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

No Related Submission Found