Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength

Fatih Demirci (1) , Samet Tekin (2)
(1) İnonü University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Malatya, Turkey , Türkiye
(2) Fırat University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Elazığ, Turkey , Türkiye

Abstract

Aim: In this in vitro study, the effect of two adhesive systems applied to surfaces of different polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a composite resin was compared.


Methodology: Eighty PEEK specimens were divided into four groups (n=20): Unfilled PEEK (UF), carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK (CFR), glass-fiber-reinforced PEEK (GFR), and ceramic-reinforced PEEK (CR). Each group was further divided into two subgroups (n=10): Visio.link (VL) and Single Bond Universal (SB). The specimens with 8-mm diameter and 5-mm thickness were prepared. SBS was examined using a universal testing machine. Results were statistically analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc test. Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. Surface properties were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The surface properties of the specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). 


Results: Effect of different PEEK and adhesive systems on SBS was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). SBS values for CFR-VL and UF-VL groups were statistically more significant than those for CFR-SB and UF-SB groups (p=0.001). SBS values for the GFR-VL group were statistically more significant than that for the UF-VL group (p=0.001). SBS values for the CF-SB group were statistically more significant than those for CFR-SB and CFR-SB groups (p=0.001). Failure modes were examined using a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification, and adhesive and mixed failure modes were observed.


Conclusion: PEEK composites with different contents and properties can be used in fixed prosthetic restorations. However, additional experimental and clinical studies are required to investigate different PEEK frameworks and composite veneers.


 


How to cite this article: Demirci F, Tekin S. Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. Int Dent Res 2021;11(2):54-61. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no2.1


 


Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

Authors

Fatih Demirci
Samet Tekin
samet.tekin@ymail.com (Primary Contact)
Demirci, F., & Tekin, S. (2021). Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. International Dental Research, 11(2), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no2.1
Copyright and license info is not available

Article Details

How to Cite

Demirci, F., & Tekin, S. (2021). Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. International Dental Research, 11(2), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no2.1

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Areas for use of PEEK material in dentistry

Samet Tekin, Suzan Cangül, Özkan Adıgüzel, Yalçın Değer
Abstract View : 4345
Download :13107

PEEK in dentistry, properties and application areas

Canan Akay, Miraç Berke Ersöz
Abstract View : 1506
Download :1403

Evaluation of shear bond strength of amalgam restorations repaired with composite resin by different surface treatments

Suzan Cangül, Özkan Adıgüzel, Begüm Erpaçal, Mehmet Ünal, Musa Acartürk, Ömer Satıcı
Abstract View : 817
Download :534