Stress distribution of customized abutment material and angles in dental implant systems: A finite element analysis

Reza Mohammadi(1), Mehmet Gökberkkaan Demirel(2), Meryem Erdoğdu(3)
(1) Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Dentistry, Konya, Türkiye,
(2) Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Konya, Türkiye,
(3) Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Konya, Türkiye

Abstract

Aim: Dental implants and abutments are often made from titanium for its biocompatibility and excellent material properties. However, in patients with thin gingival biotypes, titanium abutment margins may be visible and aesthetically unpleasing. This study aims to use finite element analysis to evaluate stress distribution in implant components, restoration materials, and biological tissues for implants placed at different angles using various customized abutment materials.


Methodology: 3D models of a three-member implant-supported fixed prosthesis were created using SolidWorks, with implants placed at positions 44 (4I) and 46 (6I). These models were imported into EXOCAD to design prosthetic restorations on custom abutments at three angles: straight (KD0), 10 degrees (KD10), and 20 degrees (KD20). Abutments were made from alumina (AL), titanium (TI), and zirconia (ZI). A 150N load was applied to the occlusal table at a 30° angle in the buccolingual direction. Stress distribution was measured as von Mises Stress values (vMS).


Results: For implants, the lowest vMS value was observed in the KD0-AL group (4I: 9.984 MPa, 6I: 22.91 MPa), while the highest vMS value was found in the KD20-TI group (4I: 25.30 MPa, 6I: 42.03 MPa). Custom abutment and custom abutment screws (in general) showed higher vMS values in AL material and lower vMS values in TI material. In contrast, for cortical bone and restoration material, higher vMS values were observed in the TI material and lower vMS values in the AL material.


Conclusion: Dental implants require effective stress distribution from occlusal loads to ensure long-term success. Excessive stress on the abutment and abutment screw can compromise the prosthetic outcome. Therefore, titanium (TI) abutments are preferred in the posterior region for their durability, despite being less aesthetically pleasing. Additionally, a higher implant angle reduces strength, negatively impacting the implant's performance.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

Authors

Reza Mohammadi
mohammadireza41@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Mehmet Gökberkkaan Demirel
Meryem Erdoğdu
Mohammadi, R., Demirel, M. G. ., & Erdoğdu, M. . (2024). Stress distribution of customized abutment material and angles in dental implant systems: A finite element analysis. International Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.567

Article Details

How to Cite

Mohammadi, R., Demirel, M. G. ., & Erdoğdu, M. . (2024). Stress distribution of customized abutment material and angles in dental implant systems: A finite element analysis. International Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.567
Smart Citations via scite_

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Endodontically Treated Tooth Restored with Carbon and Titanium Posts

Özkan ADIGÜZEL, Sadullah KAYA, Senem YİĞİT ÖZER, Yalçın DEĞER, Emine GÖNCÜ BAŞARAN, İzzet YAVUZ
Abstract View : 1237
Download :317